Li Auto | Why Does Battery Degradation Occur Faster Than Model 3?

 

The battery degradation of Model 3 2019 is less than that of Li ONE 2020 based on their performance comparisons.
Data indicates that the Model 3’s battery shows about a 11.6% degradation with a remaining capacity of 89.3%.
In contrast, the Li ONE 2020 shows a 10.3% degradation with a remaining capacity of 75.6%.


It is crucial to consider Depth of Discharge (DOD) when analyzing battery performance, which refers to the percentage of the battery that has been discharged relative to its total capacity.The battery degradation rates of electric vehicles (EVs) play a critical role in shaping consumers’ purchasing decisions. As two notable players in the EV market, Li Auto and Tesla offer different value propositions, particularly regarding battery performance. Recent data suggests that the battery degradation of Li Auto’s ONE is occurring at a faster rate compared to Tesla’s Model 3. This article dissects the factors contributing to this difference.

Battery Performance Overview

The Tesla Model 3, introduced in 2019, has demonstrated a battery retention rate of approximately 89.3% after three years of use. In contrast, the Li Auto ONE, which debuted in 2020, shows only a 75.6% retention rate after just two years of operation. The consequences of this disparity are significant for consumer confidence in product longevity and resale value.

Understanding Battery Degradation

Battery degradation is influenced by various factors, including battery chemistry, thermal management, charge cycles, and environmental conditions. Generally, lithium-ion batteries experience a decline in capacity due to processes like lithium plating and electrolyte degradation, which can be accelerated by high temperatures and excessive charging.

Comparing Battery Technologies

The lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries used in Li Auto’s products provide reliable thermal stability and safety. However, Tesla’s battery technology primarily utilizes nickel-cobalt-aluminum (NCA) and nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) chemistries, which have been optimized over time to offer better energy density and longevity.

Usage Patterns Affecting Degradation

Usage patterns also significantly affect battery health. The deeper the depth of discharge (DoD) on a battery during charge cycles, the more stress accumulated over time, leading to higher degradation rates. While both Li Auto and Tesla recommend optimal charging habits, patterns of use may vary among consumers, potentially exacerbating degradation in working conditions not typically accounted for in standard testing protocols.

Consumer Insights and Future Implications

Understanding battery performance is crucial for consumers considering EV ownership. Tesla’s longer retention rate can translate to increased resale value and consumer trust. Meanwhile, Li Auto may need to address these concerns as they expand their market presence. Future advancements in battery technology, such as solid-state batteries or improved thermal management systems, could yield better long-term performance for Li Auto.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Li Auto offers competitive features in its ONE model, the observed faster battery degradation when compared to Tesla’s Model 3 raises valid concerns among potential consumers. As the EV market evolves, manufacturers will need to adapt to consumer expectations regarding battery longevity, pushing for continual improvement in battery technology and design.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *